2 weeks ago Qassia.com was featured here in an article as a way to get free backlinks. Qassia is an effort to acquire user submitted “intelligence” (articles) on all topics. Similar to Wikipedia or the upcoming Google Knol, Qassia hopes to be a storehouse of knowledge. In exchange, they pay you in backlinks and Qassia Dollars. Now we revisit Qassia and see the results.
To test this service I submitted my Top 5 Entrecard Tips and Tricks article. This earned a C++ rating and paid me $100 Qassia dollars. Next I submitted the Create an Entrecard “monthly top dropper” widget for WordPress for an E++ rating and $40, almost the worst possible ranking. Clearly the Qassia reviewers were clueless. They were confusing “intel” with “quality articles”. A recipe is good intel, a review of the recipe isn’t, it’s opinion. Also, reviewers were giving long intel high marks and short intel low marks regardless of quality.
Bottom line, Qassia is “Garbage in, Garbage out”. You don’t learn anything there you wouldn’t learn from simply Googling the answer. Already I see people gaming the system for a couple of worthless Qassia Dollars. So to have some fun, I submitted the following “intel”.
Determining where that smell of flatulence came from
He who smelt it, dealt it. That means the person who notices the smell is usually the guilty party. Better to make a face and not say anything, This way you acknowledge the unpleasant smell, without actually saying it exists.”
Good intel? You betcha! Silly and immature? In the extreme, and also good for $20 Qassia dollars and an E++ rating. Seeing as how you can write 2 short crappy articles faster than one good article and still end up getting panned by the Qassia review snobs, Game away.
Is Qassia useless? Not at all. It’s just one more tool for those who Digg or Sphinn every article they write. Eventually you may be able to spend your Qassia dollars on advertising. I’m $2,490 Qassia dollars richer than before I tested the service. Remember, Qassia is still in beta testing and new features and improvements arrive daily. The promise of backlinks has yet to materialize because it hasn’t gone live, but I got quite a few just writing about the service. Check out Qassia for free.
|
|
|
|
|
|






8 users commented in " Qassia Revisited "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback **********You are definitely right on everything. Maybe once people get the hang of it, it will be more fruitful (doubt it). It probably won’t amount to much unless they figure out a way to better judge articles.
How many people actually read before they grade? 10%? Maybe?
I’m still trying to figure out it’s usefulness myself. After seeing how low the intel reviews are, I’m debating whether or not I want to spend any amount of time submitting intel just to get slammed by a clueless reviewer.
I am also a Qassia user and got a good chuckle from your post. I am beginning to doubt the usefulness of any of the intel and as you say, have yet to see any backlinks. But if worst comes to worst, I can use my Qassia dollars to pay my taxes LOL
I joined qassia after hearing about it from you - but I can’t say that I have done too much with it. I like the link building ability of it - but I think you are correct on the reviewers there - they don’t seem to necessarily know what they are saying.
Are the Qassia bucks used for anything yet?
Gary: You have to to wonder about a system where non-experts judge expert topics
Heidi: I think I am done as well until their promised updates arrive
Sue: Backlinks should arrive once they allow google to search their database. I’ve seen a few visitors from their site.
Matt: Haven’t seen anything to spend them on yet.
Definitely Turnip. We’ll just have to wait and see if the backlinks are worth it, they sure as hell got a ton of links from everyone asking others to join.
I hope the intel does work, as I tried to pick a few high paying keywords
I too have suffered from the snobish reviews of intel also. But, I think once the perpetual Beta is over some kind of reward will be gained.
I use qassia now!
Leave A Reply